All posts in the Conspiracy category

If Patsy accidentally killed Jon Benet Ramsey

Published September 30, 2016 by mmc7

This article was written before I saw the interview of Burke. After hearing him speak and describe how he went back downstairs after everyone was in bed asleep, he placed himself at the scene of the crime,  with opportunity & motive. This really changed my opinion about his guilt. I recommend reading the Burke timeline article.

It was Patsy Ramsey who accidentally killed daughter Jon Benet Ramsey. Not Burke.

Here’s why.

Patsy told police that Burke was sleeping until police arrived. However, Burke could be heard on the 911 call in the background asking what was going on. He wouldn’t have done that if he killed his sister. He was just a child at the time.

The ransom note was a long 3 page wordy letter with specifics on John’s bonus amount. It was written on Patsy’s writing pad with Patsy’s pen from inside the house. Several previous letter attempts were found discarded. No kidnapper would sit in the house writing a long letter. They would have brought the letter with them and it would be short & brief. Women write long wordy letters. Rarely men and certainly not kidnappers. Why would anyone leave a random note and not take the child if Jon Benet was not  abducted.

The family was planning to leave on a plane flight early in the morning. A wet bed left unattended could start a spontaneous combustion fire so a mother rushing to pack & get ready to leave would have been enraged at having  to deal with washing sheets and the mattress. Jon Benet had also gotten up and eaten pineapple.

I would suspect she was not allowed to eat or drink at bedtime to prevent wetting so this would have broken the rules. So Patsy would have been outraged about the wet bed & her daughter up eating pineapple because she was pressed for time for their early flight.

Patsy either woke up because she heard her daughter was up or else she had gotten up to get everything ready for their plane flight early that morning. She found Jon Benet in the kitchen eating pineapple (which was still on the table when the police arrived).  Her mother likely knew the bed was wet from the odor on her daughter and was angry about the wet bed and her daughter eating pineapple at night which was probably against the rules. Eating & drinking at bedtime promotes bed wetting.

I think Patsy angrily took Jon Benet into the bathroom, washed her bottom with the washcloth police found & tests determined it had urine on it from Jon Benet. Only a mother would have washed her child to remove the urine. So this proves Patsy was awake after the bed had been wetted because the soiled washcloth was found by police. Then Patsy gave her clean underwear to wear instead of her soiled garments which Jon Benet probably removed before her mother found her. No intruder would have given her clean dry underwear from her dresser after she wet the bed.

Then Patsy may have pushed her daughter’s head against the toilet (like pushing a puppy’s nose into the spot where it peed) and said “that’s where you are supposed to pee!” She probably pushed her head down too hard and cracked the side of her head on the toilet.

Jon Benet likely immediately began to go into convulsions from the brain injury and died. That would have been very scary for her mother to see. Patsy likely became hysterical and went into panic. A temporary insanity and fear of going to jail.

It doesn’t take much force to crack a skull when impacting a hard surface. I had my forehead split open when the edge of a goose’s wing clipped me. I was holding a large, adult pet goose and he decided to fly. I barely felt the bone on the edge of the wing because it was covered with feathers. It just felt like a mild bump on the head. I didn’t know I was injured until the blood ran down my face.

I think her mother accidentally pushed Jon Benet’s head against the toilet a little harder than she had intended. Or she could have hit her head on the sink or the bathtub. But the toilet is the most likely. Porcelain is very hard.

I don’t think it was intentional abuse. Patsy was tired and stressed. They had come home late from a party and only had a few hours sleep before she had to get the family ready for their trip early that morning.

Likely, Jon Benet began convulsing and died. Patsy panicked. Jon Benet had a 7 or 8 inch impact injury on the side of her head. A perfect match for a toilet impact which could easily have created the injury. Instead of calling the hospital and saying her daughter slipped on the wet bathroom floor barefooted  and struck her head or that she had found her daughter lying on the bathroom floor… Patsy was terrified she would go to jail and her son would grow up without a mother.

I suspect her husband John helped. Either because he didn’t want his wife to go to jail or because Patsy blackmailed him to help. Either way, the girl was carried downstairs and her hair tangled with the garland on the staircase on the way down… the garland tangled in her hair indicates she was being carried downstairs. So the injury occurred upstairs after she was washed and after she ate pineapple.

Patsy put duct tape over her daughter’s mouth and created a ligature around her neck with a broken handle from one of her paint brushes and some rope. (the police determined these items were all Patsy’s) The ligature rope and tape had been bought by Patsy just a couple days earlier… probably to use for sealing boxes for shipping. They found the receipt and proof of her purchase. The rope and tape used on Jon Benet matched the ones she bought.

What crook would have used Patsy’s writing pad, her pen, her paintbrush handle, her rope and her duct tape? There was no evidence that Jon Benet fidgeted or expressed her tongue against the tape over her mouth… meaning she was unconscious or dead when she was strangled. There was no petechial hemorrhaging in the eyes… meaning she was not alive when she was strangled. Patsy wanted it to look like an intruder.  Jon Benet was also wrapped in a blanket but not the wet blanket from her bed. She was still in her underwear so the blanket was an act of a parent’s compassion to not lay their child on a cold basement floor even if she was dead. The child clearly died from the 8 inch impact on her head according to the report. Likely from hitting the toilet but the police didn’t figure that out. However, I still think this was an accident during a sudden surge of anger due to the stress of rushing for an early plane flight.

Patsy was not thinking clearly. She made it look like an intruder, then she sat down and wrote that 3 page rambling letter…. making several attempts which she discarded in the trash. She was also trying to disguise her handwriting. She probably wore gloves and tried to make it sound like one of those Patty Hearst terrorist kidnapping ransom letters. But kidnappers don’t leave the child nor leave a letter when the child is dead in the house. Nor do they sit for 2 or 3 hours composing a letter using Patsy’s writing pad and pen. Nor would they leave a ransom note spread out on a step on the narrow spiral staircase.  It wasn’t even the main staircase. It was a back staircase to the kitchen (I think). A genuine kidnapper would leave it in the child’s bed or on the front door or in the kitchen on the table. And it would have only been a couple sentences long. A genuine ransom note would not be 3 pages rambling and a bizarre exact sum of John’s Christmas bonus of 118,000.

A genuine ransom note would be something like, “We have your daughter. We want $120,000 for her return.  Do not call police. We will contact you with instructions.” Not nonsensical terrorist ravings.

Interestingly, John waited until the police arrived and he had a friend as a witness to accompany him in a search for his daughter when the police asked him to take another look around the house for his daughter or anything out of place. That was when John and his friend went downstairs and walked right to Jon Benet’s location as if he knew exactly where to go. He picked up the child and carried her upstairs, disturbing the crime scene with his friend who could witness and back up his story that he had innocently found the dead child. John also claimed to have broken into that basement window a few days earlier when he was locked out… just in case he needed to explain any evidence of his presence at the scene without being blamed for staging. There were no footprints outside in the snow except perhaps one but not sure about prints but they had contractors there.

The fact that John and his friend went directly to the location of the child when the police asked him to look around the house again, indicates  John was aware of Patsy’s situation and either helped Patsy or he remained quiet… either for fear of arrest or blackmail or trying to help keep Patsy out of jail. He took an unsuspecting friend with him so he could have a witness.

I also doubt the police bothered to check the cars to see if the hoods were warm from being driven.

Why would a crook, strangle a dead child? They also said there were signs of molestation without semen or saliva. This could have been done with a paintbrush handle or broom handle to make it appear to be a molestation. They were never specific on this issue. Again, part of the crime staging. Patsy was clearly in a panic and not thinking. But in a bad enough panic to do terrible things to her child’s dead body to make it look like an intruder.

As I suggested, she should have said she found the child dead in the bathroom or have said the child slipped and hit her head. But people don’t think straight when they are scared of ending up in prison for life and fear for their other child. If  the local police are notorious for going after the innocent that could also be a significant reason.

As I previously stated on my other post, the DNA on the “Outside” of her underwear was found years later. Little girls drop their underwear around their ankles and let it lay on the floor when they go to the bathroom…. where it can pick up all sorts of DNA from a bathroom floor. Little girls also sit on the floor or carpets with their underwear contacting the floor or furniture when they sit while wearing a dress. Again, this picks up DNA from those places. As for the single pubic hair on the blanket, men who wear boxer shorts are constantly shedding pubic hairs. Especially when they scratch themselves. It drops down the leg of their pants onto the floor as they walk around. Jon Benet was wrapped in a blanket on the basement floor where workmen had been renovating. See how easily DNA could convict an innocent man? You should think twice about those boxer shorts. A stray hair transported on a shoe could convict an innocent man. Courts & jurors are so certain of DNA infallibility. A discarded used Condom could be used to set up an innocent person as a killer or rapist. The contents, if immediately used to possibly impregnate for paternity.

If the child had been molested that day, the DNA would be inside her panties and on her body where she was handled. Most child molesters are oral sex addicts. So saliva would be there. Especially since a child her age would not be able to accommodate an adult male. Also, the child would not have been wearing underwear if someone were molesting her. Why strangle a dead child and put her underwear back on her?

If you had tape across your mouth you would be trying to remove it and using your tongue to unstick it. Also, strangulation causes the tongue to protrude and pinpoint hemhorraging in the eyes. Jon Benet showed no sign of struggle or strangling.

By the time Patsy finally agreed to a polygraph… quite some time after the event, she had been under the advice of a lawyer and was taking medicines to keep her calm. Drugs which would surpress the indications of deception during a test. Patsy also took many practice polygraph sessions setup by her lawyer.  So she was well covered by her lawyer for a polygraph. I remember it was a long time after. Their lawyer did an excellent job of threatening to sue the police every time they suggested the possibility that the parents knew something. There was also something weird about their relationship with the DA who did not follow the jurors recommendation to try the parents for the child’s death.

Even the police felt Patsy’s handwriting significantly matched the ransom letter. But there was never enough evidence to try the parents. Plus they left the state and made it impossible for the police to do their jobs… as did the DA who seemed to be a friend or beholding to John. Perhaps they were both Freemasons… or Jaycees. You often see politicians and business owners join these organizations for contacts and they have a code to support each other. It would be the most likely explanation for the DA’s behavior. They may also have been friends and Ramsey may have funded or helped the DA’s political campaign or had dirt on the DA. I heard some talk about that at the time.  Whatever the case, the DA refused the grand jury’s recommendation to indict the parents and try them for the death of their daughter… and had the records sealed for over 10 years to hide the grand jury’s decision.

As I said, I think it was an accident when Patsy was upset about her wetting the bed and having to prepare everything for an early plane flight. Patsy just hit her daughter’s head against the toilet too hard in her anger… as I said, it doesn’t take much of an impact to cause such damage to the head when skull bone hits a hard surface. Patsy panicked when her daughter convulsed and died. Instead of saying the child slipped and hit her head, Patsy went into a panic meltdown and tried to make it look like an intruder. But hospital’s were always terrorizingly questioning children if their parents hurt them and not taking no for an answer. They did this to my child when he was  2 years old & he got his finger caught in the window of a toy truck. 6 hospital employees descended upon him when he was in x ray and they separated us. They kept badging him over and over if his parents did this and he kept saying cruck for truck. Thankfully he stuck to his cruck but what if he hadn’t from their bullying of him. This is how they terrorized innocent parents and children. His finger was barely red. I just wanted to make sure his finger wasn’t injured. It was not. It teaches you not to trust hospitals.  So I can see why Patsy panicked with this type of mentality. If she had said her daughter slipped they would have descended upon her. Children also get bruises playing but Child services sees every bruise as abuse. I am covered with bruises every day as an adult & I don’t remember most. My entire family bruises easily.

Patsy was guilty of involuntary manslaughter but I just wanted to show the mentality of authorities & why she panicked.

Also, the fact that the child had been washed off after peeing her bed indicates there was no intruder. An intruder would not stop to wash off the child or feed her pineapple. Give her clean, dry underwear. She was clearly carried downstairs because her hair had tangled with the garland on the staircase. So she had eaten the pineapple then went back upstairs where she was washed and hit her head. Either from being pushed into the toilet like scolding a puppy for peeing… or possibly slapped and fell against the toilet.

Again, an intruder would not have fed her, taken her back upstairs to wash her, give her clean underwear, wrap her in a clean blanket, attach the tape to her mouth, then carried her back downstairs where her hair tangled with the garland, taken her to the basement,  then struck her in the head, molested (without leaving DNA on the body), strangled her with Patsy’s rope tape & paintbrush handle, replaced the child’s underwear, then gone back upstairs and spend a couple hours to write a long wordy 3 page letter with specific details about John’s bonus no one else would know… using Patsy’s pad and pen and throwing out letter starts in the trash can (in the kitchen I think) which shows the location where the letter was written, leaving the wordy 3 page ransom on the stairs for a dead child which was left lying inside the house in the very basement room where John had broken the window… then the instruder left without leaving footprints. Does any of this sound likely to you?

Also, a neighbor heard a scream around 2 AM. I’m not sure of the exact time but it was early.

Just the letter alone should tell you that the guilty party was Patsy. When you include the fact that it was Patsy’s writing pad and the discarded pages still had imprints of previous things she had written in her own handwriting, her pen, her paintbrush handle, her rope, her tape, the wet washcloth used to wash the pee from the child,, the pineapple on the table and in the child’s stomach means she got out of bed to eat it since the parents claimed she was asleep when they returned home from the party and put her to bed without waking her up…. so she had to have gotten up after peeing the bed to eat and be washed where she was likely injured. Then wrapped in a clean blanket, carried downstairs, a staged molestation and strangulation ligature of a dead child, then writing the 3 page letter for ransom of a dead child still in the house which asked for the exact amount of money of John’s Christmas bonus.

Then there is Burke who was supposed to be asleep until the police arrived who could be heard in the background of a 911 call asking what was going on. This alone should clear him. He was a child. He wouldn’t have been asking what was going on if he did it. There probably aren’t any of the original investigators around who still remember about the 911 call 20 years ago.

It was clearly the mother… Patsy who did it  by accident and staged a kidnapping to cover it up.

The only alternate scenario would be if Patsy had gotten up and found John molesting their daughter and he struck the girl for not cooperating and she accidentally struck her head or her mother hit her with something out of jealousy… then she blackmailed John to keep them both out of jail. They said there were signs of previous, older molestations. This is usually damage to the Hymen which covers the vagina until broken during sex when old enough to accommodate a male organ. It can be damaged with hands or objects when a child is very young. But Patsy could have known about previous molestations her husband had done. My sister sat back and allowed her husband to molest his and her own daughter and others. So if you think a mother would not permit such an act, you are wrong.

Patsy had Jon Benet dressed up to look like a miniature woman for those pagents and even to show her off at parties and such. The perfect lure for a predator, including a family member or even a father. But dressing her up like that with makeup, hair styles and outfits like an adult was painting a target on her daughters back. We can not be sure her father was the culprit or if Jon Benet was ever molested at all… but it could have been a catalyst in this alternate scenario. But I think John was compelled to help due to blackmail or panic or sympathy for his wife to keep her out of jail. He either kept quiet or helped in some minimal way. The extent of his involvement is unclear. I think most or all was done by Patsy while panicking and she had already done the staging to cover her tracks before John ever woke up. From the 911 call, Burke clearly had just woken up when they made the call to report their child was missing and finding a ransom note because Burke did not know what was happening in the background of the recording. So he is clear for sure… although he may have learned details later. So that TV show, which I did not see, made a huge error in blaming him. He was also a  child at the time.

The parents immediately lawyered up. I believe they may have called the lawyer before calling police. There is nothing wrong with this because the police often accuse innocent parents instead of searching for a criminal. Police make so many errors and almost always go after the parents, so it would be unwise to talk to the police without legal protection. It is not a sign of guilt to get a lawyer. Everyone in a similar situation should always have a lawyer immediately. But in this case, the lawyer was so effective that the Ramsey’s were never held accountable. But since I believe it was an accident, there wouldn’t be much point or anything to be gained by imprisoning the parents… however, they should have spent a couple years in prison for tampering with the crime scene and the abuse of the child’s body in making it appear to be a crime scene and false testimony to the police, but Patsy could have gotten off since she was clearly temporarily insane with panic over what she had done and all reason and common sense had left her. Again, no point in taking her to trial. So you can see how the police  just dropped the issue. They either saw no point or they just did not have enough solid evidence. Only circumstantial evidence which clearly pointed to Patsy but would not be enough to convince a trial jury to convict. The grand jury could see the evidence pointed to Patsy and possible John was an accessory after the fact… but when it comes to finding someone guilty and sentencing them beyond a reasonable doubt, that is where the system would fail. No jury could convict beyond a reasonable doubt on the circumstantial evidence despite the fact it overwhelmingly pointed to Patsy. The jury would not be able to look past the “beyond reasonable doubt” part of the trial sentencing or guilt. Her prints on the ransom letter would have been the type of evidence needed. But I don’t think they found any prints at all. Or if they even checked for prints from the hand. She likely wore gloves when writing it. So these are the possible reasons they never tried the case.

The public has always demanded an explanation and the name of the guilty party who could have killed such a beautiful child. They would not be able to step back and see it as an accident or unintended manslaughter. They simply want someone to pay.  At the very least, the public would like to know who did it and why. It is a shame Patsy did not leave a sealed  confession with her lawyer to be read after her husband died. It is unfortunate that the boy is now unfairly being blamed for his sisters death.  He is completely innocent of killing or even staging his sister’s death. The 911 recording exhonerates him… although he may have found out the truth later by accident… but I don’t think so. Patsy was the type who obsessed on what other people thought. She was a former pageant queen herself.  So she would never confess to anyone, even if it was an accident. As I said, she should have said the child slipped in the bathroom… unless there were marks on the child from a spanking, slap or other issues which prevented her and she had to create a fictitional villain to cover it up. The letter was the most foolish and even sounded like her when the letter said John would need to get rest and sleep for the ransom instructions he would be receiving. And of course, none ever came because the entire letter was a piece of fiction as was the terrorist group she invented. What terrorists would go after the owner of a business franchise and why bother with a child when they could kidnap the owner of the business…. John Ramsey himself. You have to step back and look at the entire picture to see how ludicrous the staging was. However, the proof the child was dead before the strangling was definitely solid. That does prove her cause of death was staged to hide the evidence of the injury to the side of her head.

I can clearly remember every detail of the Jon Benet killing from the very day it occurred and all the details which followed as I can also remember all the minute details for Laci Peterson, OJ Simpson and Darlie Routier. Every detail about Jon Benet Ramsey was broadcast daily for years. So I remember each item as they found out about it. Not like the millenials who were spoonfed only selected details after the fact. The same for the X generation who were still in their teens when Jon Benet was killed. It is the parents of the X gen and those older generations who were old enough at the time Jon Benet was killed to remember the details.

Here is a general list of things I remember:

  • Patsy’s note pad
  • Patsy’s pen
  • long, wordy 3 page letter
  • listed exact amount of John’s bonus. Not rounded off
  • several discarded letter starts
  • Letter written in house. Likely took a couple hours to write it.
  • Impressions of previous letters on pad
  • neighbor heard scream about 2 am (?)
  • Patsy’s broken paint brush handle
  • Rope and tape Patsy purchased day’s earlier
  • No DNA on child or inside underwear
  • No petechial hemhorraging
  • No evidence of struggle or movement behind tape on mouth
  • No tongue protrusion from strangling
  • wetted bed
  • Wet washcloth in bathroom used to wash child after bed wetting
  • Clean dry blanket lovingly wrapped around child.
  • Hair tangled in stairway garland
  • Pineapple in kitchen on table when police arrived
  • Pineapple in child’s stomach. Was not served at party they attended.
  • crime scene disturbed by John removing the child from basement.
  • The house was filled with friends when police arrived.
  • The entire crime scene was tainted by too many people
  • Police did not control the scene or remove people from it
  • police didn’t preserve much evidence from scene.
  • No precautions to avoid contamination
  • did not check vehicles for warm engines.
  • home had also been contaminated with construction workers renovations
  • Burke just woke up when parents called 911
  • Burke’s voice in background asking what was going on
  • I believe Patsy called friends and lawyer before calling police
  • Friends were inside the house when police arrived.
  • Parents would have called police first in true kidnapping.
  • The crime scene contamination & asking friends over was deliberate.
  • Parents did not cooperate much except for initial description of events
  • Then parents lawyered up
  • Procrastinated further interviews
  • Refused police interview of son
  • Procrastinated polygraph
  • took medications during polygraph
  • took practice polygraphs with attorney before police
  • avoided police instead of helping to find supposed killer
  • remained out of state to avoid investigation
  • years later DNA tested. no chain of custody protection
  • only found DNA on exterior clothing. It is often found on brand new clothing
  • District Attorney refused to comply with grand jury recommendation
  • Grand jury findings were sealed for over 10 years.
  • Grand jury said parents were the likely culprits.
  • Findings that head injury was cause of death
  • likely was an accident in my opinion
  • Scene was staged to look like kidnapping
  • Child was never removed from home and was dead
  • Yet a ransom note was left even though child was left behind.
  • Findings that child had signs of older molestation injuries.
  • Phony terrorist group





UFO Tips & Tidbits

Published December 20, 2014 by mmc7

I was watching some UFO documentaries and there are a few details which occurred to me that the general public may not know. Especially the younger generations. Here are some tips to identifying genuine UFO’s and how to recognize military flares intended to purposely distract the public away from the real UFO. Also, how to take better photos to avoid ending up with squiggly images.


#1 Sonic Booms

Sonic booms sound quite deafeningly loud like an explosion when an aircraft exceeds the speed of sound. For someone who has never heard one, I imagine it might be quite unnerving. When I was a child and my parents worked in aerospace, we used to hear sonic booms near Wichita several times a day. We got used to it after a while. The sonic booms always occur from behind… quite a distance after the aircraft passes over. The plane is moving faster than the sound. So if you are looking for the source of a sonic boom… don’t check directly above you. The craft will already be a distance away.  The larger the craft, the louder the boom.

It has been years since I’ve heard a sonic boom. The last time I heard a similar sound was when the Space Shuttle exploded above us. Sonic booms were forbidden over populated areas after the FAA pulled a stupid stunt of subjecting Oklahoma City to 8 booms per day for 6 months and were hit with a class action lawsuit which the FAA lost. This was also the reason the US did not participate in the SST program. But back in the 50’s and 60’s, it was a new toy to the aerospace companies and the USAF. So we were pummeled with them until we moved from the area. Wichita used to be called the Air Capital of the world due to all the aircraft companies there at the time. Boeing, Cessna, Piper, McConnell AFB, etc.

However, I suspect the sonic boom rule doesn’t apply when the military jets are chasing a UFO. I’m sure the UFO’s also create a few sonic booms of their own during a hasty departure.


#2 Aircraft lights

All earth aircraft (including military) must use a green light on the right side and a red light on the left side.

The reason aircrafts use the red and green lights is so a pilot flying on VFR visual flight rules, can discern which direction another aircraft is flying. This allows you to determine whether the aircraft is coming at you or flying away from you. You would be amazed at how difficult it is to perceive speed or direction of another aircraft when flying a plane visually without any radar, etc.  There is also a white light on the tail which allows an approaching pilot to determine the direction of cross traffic. Many commercial craft will also have a yellow rotating light on top and some will have one on the bottom as well. Again, this helps other pilots recognize and avoid collisions. When landing, an aircraft will deploy super bright landing lights as it prepares for the landing pattern approach to the airport. Commercial planes also used bright strobe lights when landing. Planes also use a taxi light near the landing gear when on the ground.

Unless we have some type of agreement with the EBE’s (extra terrestrial biological entities) to honor our FAA regulations on their UFO’s, I would suspect the ebe crafts do not have red and green lights. These lights are required on all of our craft. Keeping in mind that we are not familiar with classified military and experimental craft which could easily look like a UFO. The telltail red and green lights should help in that identification of an earth craft. Also, aircraft landing lights are quite bright if you have never seen one oncoming during a landing.  So, if there are red and green lights on the craft you are seeing, then it probably is an earth air craft. Hopefully, this will help you to determine what you are seeing.

Helicopters at night can also be disconcerting if you are not accustomed to seeing them. Especially if they are using search lights and feathering their blades into a silent mode.

HOWEVER, I had 3 black unmarked helicopters fly past my house below 100 ft above ground. Possibly as low as 50 ft. They were just barely above the trees and flying over open fields. They were trying to fly as soundlessly as possible but you could feel the vibrations. What was even more unusual, they did not have any markings as required by FAA for identification and the 2nd and third helicopters were flying with no lights whatsoever. Not even the required red and green lights. Only the lead helicopter had the red and green lights and nothing else. The other two in tight formation were completely dark. No lights of any kind. It was just the dark side of twilight, just barely enough light to see the outline of the copters against the distant city lights and a slight green glow from dashboard lights. They were quite clear for me to see since they were only about 50 ft away from me as they passed by; flying barely 30ft higher than the roof of my one story house.  I could even see the silhouette of the pilots at the controls as they passed in front of me. They were certainly low enough to impact the large power lines of the lattice towers which were less than 1/4 mile away. So they must have mapped out the route in advance since power lines are nearly invisible from an aircraft during broad daylight, much less dark and do not appear on radar.

This was not just a one time occurrence. A week later, the three black helicopters returned from the opposite direction. They did this 3 years in a row sometime in July or August. This is a major Air traffic control area and they were clearly flying below radar and below minimum altitudes which were 300ft above rural and 500ft above populated areas. Certainly subject to air traffic control which they were clearly trying to avoid. No aircraft should ever be below 100 or even 50 ft unless they are setting down on a runway. Being in a helicopter is not an exception… And certainly not without any lights or any markings. It made it impossible to report them because I could not obtain any numbers to report. Nor am I located near any military base. Even the military includes identification on their aircraft and uses the standard lights unless they are in some stealth combat mission in a war zone. These 3 black helicopters were flying in violation of every FAA rule I know. Clearly for black ops purposes since they were violating every FAA regulation imaginable.


#3 Decoy & Flare Diversions

The military will quite often drop decoy flares and split their squadron of jets into multiple groups to distract the public from the UFO. So when they send out jets to chase down the UFO, they will send a separate jet to drop flares in the opposite direction to distract the onlookers and cameras to film the flares instead of the UFO. You may not see the jet dropping flares if it is running without lights on silent approach. But you can rest assured, if you see jets or flares… there is a real UFO in your area.

So, if you see a row of lights which gives the impression of the light multiplying and dividing into a row of separate lights… that means the military is dropping flares to distract onlookers from the real UFO in the area. They want you to look at the flares, not the UFO. Those flares can last for various prolonged periods, depending on the type they used. Some flares produce copious smoke while other flares are completely smokeless. Some use parachutes to keep them aloft by the flare heat generated below the chute.

If you see flares or a series of lights which appear to be multiplying or splitting off from a single source, those are flares. Look around, there is usually a UFO in your vicinity which the military doesn’t want you to see.

The jets will circle the UFO to force its departure, then attempt to chase down the UFO to drive it away from the populated area. While some of the jets are circling or chasing the UFO’s, other jets (usually a single jet running dark and blacked out with all lights off while throttled down and soundlessly approaching for the best stealth); tasked with invisibly dropping flares to distract onlookers and give them something else to film with their cameras.

When you see new lights appearing in the sky, one by one which sometimes give the impression they are splitting off from one light source, these are likely to be flares being deployed by a military aircraft which may be flying with its running lights off for the purpose of distracting attention and cameras away from the actual UFO. So start looking around (usually in the opposite direction) to find the real UFO.

Sometimes, the jets will come back and drop more flares on subsequent nights (claiming military practice maneuvers to prove public overreaction) simply so they can make everyone look crazy for taking films of their flares and further ridicule the UFO sightings. It is a deliberate military diversion for a genuine UFO event. However, the maximum burn time for flares I have found so far is 20 minutes.

The LUU-2 series of flares the military claimed they used in Phoenix has a nominal burn time of 240 seconds which is 4 minutes. Which means the flares the military claimed to have used in Phoenix were not capable of remaining illuminated for the 2 hours described and recorded by eye witnesses. There was also a second sighting. This usually happens if flares are involved but all the attention is given to the flares instead of the actual UFO… which is exactly what the military and gov’t wants. Here are the specifications on the burning time of the flares they claimed to use in Phoenix.

Do not be fooled by the flare decoys. Just consider this… if there are 5 bright lights on the west horizon which look like they are multiplying and only one bright light on the east horizon… which way are you going to look? Which object are you going to film? At the 5 multiplying lights or the single light? Everyone is going to look at the 5 lights (decoy flares) and completely miss or ignore the solitary light. It is quite an effective deterrent. Some of these flares can remain aloft for prolonged periods. The heat from the flare creates a lift under the parachute. A mini hot air balloon or helium balloon tether could also work. But most flares only last a few minutes. Only 20 minutes maximum burn time I have found so far.

Just use your common sense. Why would the military be dropping flares except to attract public attention away from something else. There is no reason for them to be dropping flares over a populated area except as a decoy. The gov’t has a well-oiled plan to control the public knowledge of UFO’s including a very effective method to stop the public from looking at or filming genuine UFO’s. The military goes to great efforts to decoy people into looking at and filming flares instead. The question is whether this is the idea of the military on their own or is this the policy of our gov’t executive branch? Or is this the effort of the controlling elite in key gov’t positions in the intelligence community, DOD, Cabinet, etc., to keep this knowledge solely in the hands of the elite regardless of Presidential influence. President Carter, for example, was not an elite insider. He promised to find the truth about UFO’s which he had also seen. But when he requested the info, his CIA director George HW Bush, told Carter he could not have the info because he did not have a need to know. Carter’s only failing was that he did not fire Bush on the spot. Carter was simply too nice a guy without the fortitude to take on corruption.


#4 Blue Fly UFO Response & Retrieval Team

These pilots are usually a well trained, experienced group of pilots from the Blue Fly team. Blue Fly is a highly specialized UFO retrieval team. I believe they operate out of Wright Patterson AFB. These are their best jets and most highly skilled pilots which can fly from coast to coast in minutes at supersonic speeds to engage a UFO sighting. Blue Fly has highly skilled command control with unlimited access to satellite surveillance, ground penetrating radar, laser, particle weapons, you name it. They also have retrieval teams, heavy load bearing helicopters, flatbeds, cranes, railway cars, etc. Anything they need to find and remove debris, craft, ebe’s, etc.  They are all well trained and know exactly what to do.

Blue Fly & Gov’t UFO retrieval and suppression methodologies:

  • Assess the situation
  • Identify the number & location of UFO targets
  • Assess the intent of the targets
  • Assess the level of public involvement
  • Assess local law enforcement involvement
  • Rapid pilot response to minimize public opportunity for photos, videos, evidence & witnesses
  • Deploy decoys, flares, etc., to distract public attention from UFO
  • Jet pilots circle UFO to coerce it to depart area
  • Pilots chase UFO from populated area & herd it into area best equipped to engage UFO
  • Pilots attempt to bring down and capture UFO if possible
  • Command center also uses satellite and ground  arsenal of particle, laser & heat syncing weapons
  • Deploy retrieval teams & troops to enforce security if UFO is brought down.
  • Retrieval teams and UFO recovery will cross national borders to obtain goal
  • Eliminate witnesses to UFO retrieval (including authorities from another country on their soil)
  • (Mexico, Canada, Brazil, Puerto Rico, UK, etc.)
  • Damage control team assesses public impact & prepares cover story, etc.
  • Hired “skeptics” prowl internet & media to counter & discredit any evidence or witnesses
  • Disinfo and discredit efforts are employed to create public doubts & spread ridicule & suspicion
  • Stage phony contradicting witnesses & skeptics & loudmouth bloggers to create chaos
  • Use “experts” on gov’t intel payroll from universities, etc., to demonstrate & prove cover stories
  • Discredit witnesses or proof as conspiracy theorists, confused or unreliable
  • Utilize MUFON (gov’t front org) to declare lack of scientific proof & validate gov’t “experts”
  • Gov’t ensures skeptic heavy UFO series are aired on TV to further disgust public from believing
  • Gov’t psychological mind games used to effect Pavlovian brainwashing against UFO subject
  • Public is programmed to pavlovian knee jerk reaction to conspiracy theorist labels.
  • Public eats its own like a pack of dogs smelling  blood.
  • High risk whistleblowers eliminated
  • (Martyn Stubbs, Graham Birdsall, Phil Schneider, William Colby, etc)
  • Gov’t effectively engineers suppression of UFO info & skillfully programs public response


#5 Filming UFO’s

Your camera must be absolutely still while filming. Especially at night. Otherwise, you will end up with a squiggle trail of light. A tripod would be ideal. Also, try to keep spare charged batteries handy and your camera in a handy location with the charged batteries.

Keep in mind that your automatic settings at night will slow down the shutter speed and increase the aperture opening size. If the object is in motion, you will only get squiggle lights. So you will need to increase your shutter speed to be fast enough to capture the object in motion without leaving squiggles. Take multiple images on each setting. That will increase your chances of getting a good image.

Do not do a tight zoom on UFO’s in flight. You will only end up with a blurry diamond shape from the aperture shape. If you do zoom in, only do so for a couple seconds so you will not waste your chances for a good capture of the image or video. Try medium zooms about halfway. Then full distance views. By using multiple zoom settings for a few minutes on each, you will increase your chances of getting an image which is clear enough to be enlarged on photoshop or other software by increasing the resolution. Not the zoom size.

When increasing the size of the photo using computer software, you must increase the DPI resolution to enlarge the image. Any other type of zoom will lose image quality.

Also, on your camera, you can choose from 3 levels of image quality. Just be aware that the highest quality takes up to 30 seconds to load each image. This can seem like a lifetime if your UFO is moving fast and you might lose the chance to take photos quickly. So you may wish to choose medium quality if that is the case. But if your UFO is hanging around… then try to get the best quality images possible.

Also try variable focusing. Autofocus does not work well at night. Using full distance focus or manual focus may improve your image quality. If you wear glasses, be sure to wear them with your camera. Otherwise, you will end up with blurry images if you are doing the focusing. If possible, have a second person who does not wear glasses, verify your focus. Practice your camera settings on days when you do not have a sighting so you will be ready when you do see one.


#6 Repeat UFO sightings

If you look at the clementine satellite images, you can see the structures on the moon. You can also read about them in Colonel Philip Corso’s book, the day after Roswell, where he describes why the Army had to cancel Project Horizon moonbase after seeing the first close images of the moon from Nasa’s orbital probe. I won’t get into the details here, however, the reason for frequent sightings is the ebe necessity to supply their lunar facilities. This is why areas in Wisconsin see UFO’s multiple times per week. Lake Michigan is one of their preferred sites for obtaining fresh water. The ebe’s send their water tanker crafts to extract water from the lake on a regular basis. Thus, those who live near their flight path to the water, will see them more often. (this also puts those people at increased risk should the ebe’s have unpleasant intentions while they are in the area obtaining water). The ebe’s do not have an underwater base. They are simply obtaining water for their large lunar facilities.

There are also other areas where they obtain water and other supplies for plants, food, etc., such as South America, Brazil, UK, Russia, etc. There is a danger in being alone at night when these crafts are in the area. While the ebe’s typically avoid people, they are not here to help us. They are very dangerous. So it is one thing to take photos of crafts in the air, but if you ever see them on the ground, get the hell out of there. You are in terrible danger. They are a hive mentality like the Borg. They do not want to be our friends nor do they have emotions and compassions. Mostly cold blooded experiments.


#7 Authorities

Do not contact authorities unless you want them to chase the UFO away and start dropping decoy flares. They will chase it off and come up with a cover story. The military has a vast machine to prevent and control the public access to UFO information. Their control and power to control is unlimited. You may find yourself debriefed in a way you may not appreciate. So unless you feel like you are in personal danger, don’t call authorities. They are only going to cover it up and get rid of evidence. Especially do not call them if you find debris.

Do NOT contact MUFON. They are a gov’t front organization. A honey trap to draw in, control and manage info, images, witnesses and evidence for the gov’t. Same with Friedman. UFO Hunters are also a bunch of quacks.

The only ones you can trust would be Ancient Aliens and Von Daniken. But they tend to be naïve about the authorities and aliens. Like many people, they have an over exaggerated sense of self concentric human importance in the universe. Our planet seems to think we are the center of the universe and all the other ebe races out there are hanging on our every word and helping us earthlings along in everything we do. Our planet needs to get over its over exaggerated sense of self importance in the universe. The ebe’s are not our friends nor are they here to help us. They have been on the moon and on Mars longer than we have been around. We are only the product of their need for a labor force to work in the heavy gravity and heavy oxygen levels on our planet which is too much for the ebe’s to tolerate on a prolonged basis.

Sereda is another one who may be trustworthy. It is best if you  just post your images on Youtube. Don’t trust anyone. Try to be as anonymous as possible to protect yourself against gov’t suppression.


#8 UFO Debris

Keep in mind if you find debris, it could be a satellite or other space junk. But whether it is a real UFO or space junk, it could be radioactive. Most satellites and UFO’s use radioactive fuels which could contaminate the debris. You can buy a Geiger counter online for about $350. Or you can rent one. If you see English or some other earth language and numbers on any of the debris, then you can be sure it is not a UFO. Thus, space junk. UFO’s usually have hieroglyphs but be sure not to mistake Chinese or Japanese for the symbols since they also have space junk in orbit.

Until you establish safety from radiation, chemicals, fumes, toxins, etc., Wear disposable and heavy gloves. Wear protective clothing and a disposable coverall over everything. Avoid getting cuts or skin abrasions or any physical contact with the pieces. Use a shovel to pick up debris from a distance and place debris into containers on a wagon or cart or pickup bed. Get as much as you can but stay away from anything made from dense, thick metal like a reactor housing. Do not handle or take any glowing materials no matter how pretty you think it looks. This usually indicates radiation. When collecting UFO debris, the more pieces the better in case the gov’t comes looking for them. Select some expendable pieces and isolated locations to bury them in case you are forced to give up your pieces of debris. Then you can give up those while keeping the rest of your bounty.

Just handle these pieces of debris from a distance until you can verify no radiation. If you start feeling ill & dizzy, you may be experiencing radiation sickness. Chemicals and fumes are also possible. Avoid anything that looks like mercury.

Take the debris you wish to keep and bury it in safe locations… not all at one site. The more burial sites away from the crash site you hide the debris, the better chance you will have in preventing authorities from finding them. Small pieces are very difficult for them to find with any ground penetrating radar. Keep in mind they also have satellite radar. So collect a lot of small pieces as well and spread them around various locations where you can retrieve them later. Again, do not handle any of it or get too close until you know if it is contaminated. Do not tell anyone else info or details you do not wish repeated.

Use a rake to thoroughly remove your foot tracks and tread marks around the UFO debris area, etc., unless you want the gov’t clean up retrieval crews hunting you down. Don’t send your only piece of debris to labs or universities because these are all under the auspices of the gov’t and you may never see your original piece again. If you have pieces tested, make sure it is small, expendable and never sent to a university. Never use MUFON or any other UFO group. Use a private lab and do not give them any UFO details. Ancient Aliens may be of help but keep in mind that they are too naïve about the labs and experts they use.

One person in the UK who found a large chunk of debris took 100 pieces of debris and had them made into 100 keychains. Then he sent out the keychains to 100 people. When the authorities tried to coerce him to give up his piece of debris, he told them he had 100 pieces of debris in the hands of 100 people who would all go to the media if they persisted in going after his piece of debris. If they left him alone, they would not go to the media. So they left him alone. 25 years later, he finally showed his debris on UK’s UFO magazine. It was quite impressive. A honeycomb like nothing I’ve ever seen. (do not trust the USA UFO magazine. That is a completely different group than the UK version).

However, unless you want to end up like Martyn Stubbs or Graham Birdsall or Phil Schneider or Bob Lazar or Philip Corso, etc., then it would be a good idea to use similar insurance with a lot of people to hold pieces of evidence to disseminate to the media if something should happen to you. The more people who have a piece who are ready to go public if needed, the better insurance you have that no one will come after or harm you for your evidence.


#9 Comment

I’ve never had the opportunity to see a real UFO or take any photos, but I have seen the extensive structures on the moon and Mars from the images on the Navy Clementine satellite website and the NASA Mars satellite images. They have gone to extensive efforts to censor the images but even so, there is so much to see, they could not get it all. I only found these after reading Col Philip Corso’s book describing the Pentagon reaction to the first lunar images. I looked where he indicated and found exactly what he described. Despite the gov’t efforts to spread disinfo and discredit him, Corso’s reputation and career were impeccable. He died just a year after his book was published. Anytime you see someone under attack, you should listen to what they have to say. They would not be under such vicious attacks unless they were telling the truth. Bob Lazar was another such person who was attacked for blowing the whistle on the gov’t secret UFO collection in S-4. Frankly, the public does not deserve to know the truth when they act like a pack of wild dogs smelling blood… stirred up by gov’t hirelings who were paid to destroy anyone who risks their neck to share what they know with the public. Who wants to risk their neck for an ungrateful public which turns on them. The truth is out there. All people have to do is stop attacking the whistleblowers and recognize the attackers as gov’t hirelings trying to destroy anyone attempting to reveal the truth of what they know. As long as the public does not support the whistleblowers who risk themselves to share the truth… the public does not deserve to know the truth.

Here are a few images of the moon from the US Navy’s website. They may have since removed them. I don’t know. But I got these from the official sites:


Building blurred by the Navy as shown on the official Clementine satellite website of lunar images.

E lt crop Orig Copy W35


Mining area as shown on official site. This is not due to an image collage. This rectangular area can be seen on lunar images from multiple sources, multiple satellites from different agencies, etc. There are areas blurred by the Navy at the bottom and various objects of interest all over the area. I added a few arrows to point out items of interest.

E mk crop Orig Copy section B7


Image of a craft directly from the Navy official website

E saucer crop


Vents and structures on the lunar south pole from Nasa’s site. Tint was added to bring out details. 

E Vents


Image of these same lunar vent structures from Navy image source

E Moon southpole facility S


Multiple structures like this with different hieroglyphics on top of each one.

E writing section 34


These following Mars images are from Google earth. Nasa always removes all colors. Then recolors the black and white images with false red coloring. It makes it easier to hide blue water color, etc., by making everything the same false color. The canals are still there and they are filled with water… among other things.

This is one of the canals on Mars which has water in it. You can see the lack of texture in the water and the sheen on the water and slight reflection. They attempted to blur the structures along the canal on the left side.

E canal Mars 158


Large crustaceans with antenna’sE creatures Mars 21


Some type of snail or crustacean (dinosaur sized) with 2 antennae. Also note structure to the lower right of creature.

E zoom creature Mars 17






Denver Airport Murals

Published December 14, 2014 by mmc7

Here is an interesting tidbit.

I was looking at the old mural at the Denver airport with the fire and the city and I recognized the skyline of the city in the mural. It was the Chicago skyline with the Hancock building, except the artist reversed the skyline. It is my understanding that the Airport has since painted over the city in the mural. Some of the offensive murals have been completely covered. Some were altered or updated.

Here is a cropped image of the mural shown next to a reversed skyline of Chicago’s Hancock building which has a distinctive shape and design.

Crop of Denver airport mural which shows Chicago Hancock  building skyline reversed. Compared to reversed image of Chicago Hancock building on the right.

Crop of Denver airport mural which shows Chicago Hancock building skyline reversed. Compared to reversed image of Chicago Hancock building on the right.


%d bloggers like this: